Writer’s Block: Your Online Hot Spots

Where do you spend most of your time on the web?

Live Journals Writer’s Block

I maintain what some might consider a near omni-presence around [SAS], the PC-BSD support forum, and when time permits visit DaemonForums, but over there I very much prefer to read rather then comment.

I have almost non-stop music running on my PC, sometimes I use my local collection. But many of the times I stream radio. 94.9 The Bull is one that I’ve listened to a lot, but lately I’ve spent most of my time on pandora.com thanks to hearing about it. I’ve set up a station that gives me a nice mixture of the kind of music I like, typically country and rock. Some times I listen to BBC Radio 1, I like some of the stuff they put on but not all of it.

Wikipedia makes up a large amount of my daily web intake. Most often articles related to technology or computer science. I’m really horrible when it comes to Wikipedia, I remember once during research for a history exam. I was looking up something from the 19ths century, I forget what — but the text book wasn’t good enough. By the end of it, I wound up reading about the country of Vietnam lol. The hyperlinks and search ability removes what I hate about book-based encyclopedias, it’s easy to find interesting stuff without jumping between many volumes!

When I’m interested in News, I usually check my RSS feeds. Along side my online-stored bookmarks, Flock lists RSS headlines in the my world page. I skim BBC’s international edition, because I find it superior to CNNs various offerings. And also to Slash dot, because I can usually find interesting sci-technical tibbits there that I other wise wouldn’t hear about.

xkcd.com often makes a pass through my web surfing habits, thanks to friends sending me links over AIM lol.

I often use various resources depending on what I’m dong and Google is my search engine, because the results are just better. And unlike other crap (Yahoo, Live search) there is less of a “Is your search engine really this bad, or did most of these results paid to be here?” feeling. Google just works!!! For resources, it ranges from programmer documentation, English-German and English dictionaries, and various software related sites (FBSD ports, sourceforge, etc).

When time permits and I have something to say, I’ll usually try to update my LiveJournal. What good is a LJ unless you actually use it? I’d like to update every day or two, but my life’s not that interesting. In fact, if I did update it that often, it would be rather depressing lol. The one big problem I have on spending time on the web, is keeping up with my E-Mail lol. I’ve got over 130mb of largely unread mail piled up, and that is just in my primary box.

Aside from that stuff, I’m usually logged into 5-7 instant messenger accounts and occasionally either a VoIP or IRC based system to boot. Hmm, considering how little HTML I typically use in posts, I wonder if I could cram any more hyperlinks into this post loool.

Writer’s Block: The Meaning of Love

What does love mean to you, and why? Have you always felt this way?

Submitted By rynanne

Live Journals Writer’s Block

Hmm, a question I’ve somewhat been pondering since I noticed the entry in the WB/QOTD-block. Mm, what does love mean to me?

I would rather watch the flesh melt off my bones then be without that person.

Perhaps a tad morbid, but particularly apt to the strength required to describe such a thing. In a way, maybe it is that simple as well, for me at least. Because that is generally how I feel. I’m not heroic, I’m not suicidal, but my heart can outweigh good sense — the people I care for have to make it through whether I do or not, because I wouldn’t be able to go on alone.

Any ways:

Love is forgiveness, if you really love someone, can’t you bring yourself to leave wrongs aside?

Love is endless, I believe if you truly do love someone; you never stop loving them. At least, if there is a way to stop, I’ve never found it lol.

Love is blind, each can see the blackest moments of the others life, yet love them just as much. I’m not proud of every moment of my life, nor those of everyone I love, but I still love them. If anyone can’t love me in tern, despite such things. Well, unfuck’em lol.

Love goes in both directions. Hmm, I have no idea but for a strange reason, the film Now, Voyager comes to mind. In my opinion, things have to work both ways… Haha, the Dining Philosophers problem comes to mind, I really think I need to get out more >_>.

Love isn’t a bed of roses. If you expect to ever get along perfectly with someone in this life, you’re positively nuts or dreaming IMHO. Love doesn’t just dwell in special moments, but throughout the relationship. From spending time together, to picking up something on the way home, to the most intimate moments, why have any of it unless you loved them? To quote myself, “If I didn’t love you, I’d tell you to go fuck off instead”

Love takes many forms, we each love different people in different ways. For example, it would be a bit abnormal to feel the same way about ones best friend as ones spouse, unless they are the same person lol.

When it comes to a more personal point, as in “as I do”. Generally, if I love someone, I’ll do just about anything within the terms of the law. In some cases, willing to stretch that a bit… Although that’s never been necessary (thankfully). Also I’m usually more willing to ‘bend’ my schedule when needed, at least when it’s not consistently a one-way affair. Although I almost never ask such things of others (hell, I don’t even ask people to fetch me a drink 99% of times lol), I just don’t like being ‘monopolized’ and won’t do it to others. Or as I have told my family on a number of occasions. Only GOD has a right to control my life without my permission, and you’re not GOD and you certainly don’t have my permission !!!

Mm, one thing that comes to my mind is my parents. As fate would have it, after they got engaged, there was about 20 years difference and 3 marriages between them before they finally got married. Before my father died, they were only together for a few years, but during that time they were very much together. One thing I somewhat regret, is that I never really got to see how they both interacted with one another. Although, odds are if I did, I would’ve spent the first decade of my life rolling my eyes every day >_>. I very much like spending time with people that I care about when I can. Odds are, if I didn’t, I could actually get more done. But that would be a bit selfish. In general, I do generally consider myself self-centered at times. But I do care very deeply about others, I’m just not an extrovert lol. Hanging out with friends and doing something == usually fun, finding a party just for it’s own sake != fun (by comparison).

On the more, hmm I guess the romantic side of the coin. To me sharing life is a very important thing in that regard.

My train of thought arguably wonders as far south as any other mans but that’s not what I truly desire in life. There is a very big difference between sex and making love, and in this day and age the former is easy to come by compared to the latter. I sometimes warn friends when they get to, uhh ‘zealous’, too think closer at what they desire. A ‘good time’ or something lasting — my definition of a lover goes beyond sex.

I suppose, to put it to words beyond the obvious points ^^, if I ever got married there would have to be a lot more in the relationship then just the physical aspects. I have a very active mind, and life has made me, shall we say, devoid of an intellectual counter part for much of my life. Or as I like to think of it, if bra size exceeds brain size times heart capacity; I’m not prone to being involved for long, I already have to deal with enough stupid people.

My mind comes with me, just the same as my heart and everything else does, and what future would there be unless one could share both?

Although I would say one of my favorite songs among what I would classify as ‘love songs’, paints a rather optimistic view of things (imho). I really do think of things a bit differently. I guess you could say, it’s the difference between a song you’d love to dance to with the woman of your dreams, and what you expect out of the rest of life together ^_^. All in all, I expect I’ll probably be single for my entire life; unless GOD has something else in store…. But I guess that’s just life. Still, I think that my idea of a ‘perfect’ moment. Would be to have the love of my life and our children in my arms… That would just be sublime, but I’m to rational a person to count on it happening in my life time.

Todo: Toolkit and Library madness

Examine for portability the following toolkits under these OSes: Windows NT, Mac OSX*, Unix-like.

*I sadly don’t have a Mac, although I would really love one. So a OSX binary of some form will have to pass.

GTK+ — C, C++, Perl, Python, Ruby, PHP, C#.NET (Java bindings also avail but seem to be gnome-centric)

Qt4 — C++, Perl, Python, Ruby, Java (C#.NET and PHP bindings seem to be questionable and only C++/Python and possibly Java bindings can be depended on).

WxWidgets — C++, Perl, Python, Ruby, Java, C#.NET

Swing and SWT would be considered if they were available under more languages !!!

Evaluate portable standard/add-on libraries to each language for the following capabilities:

String handling (they all do well in the language standard)
Regular Expressions (Only Perl and Ruby get this great imho)
XML Processing
Network programming — both sockets based API and protocol support (IMAP, POP, HTTP/S, FTP)
Database handling — must support MySQL, SQLite, and some form of flat file.
Basic compression and archive format support (e.g. tar; zip; gz; bz2; lzma)
Inter-Process Communication (IPC) methods and related process control (e.g. fork(), exec(), signal(), kill() type routine-families).
Ease of use and deployment

Goals:

Build up a standard frame work of toolkits/libraries/etc that are portable across both my general operating environment and the various languages I use

Attempt to standardize myself on few languages rather then rubber banding between various programming languages + sh/awk/sed/friends

Ensure full development environments are available to me under FreeBSD 7 and Windows NT 5.1 (e.g. I can code from either machine and not change tools)

At least one language for scripting/prototyping and one for more efficient execution when implemented in that language (e.g. 1 interpreted + 1 compiled)

and try to stay sane along the way without writing a few libraries in the process >_>

Oh how glad I will be when work is done for the week…..

So I can drown in other work lol.

The years of my life are taking their toll upon my soul. Bit by bit, more slips away.
Sometimes even the strongest light of hope burns dim, unto ash.

*SIGH* watching my wireless connection flubber-band between 6mb/s and 24mb/s at a distance of ~2.5m, I think it’s time to go to bed, and download a few api references in the morning….

Grrr…

EDIT:

Even worse stroke of luck, took a break and loaded up XGalaga (a nice Galaga based game), got a powerup of tripple-missle launcher in the first wave, only to lose it seconds later when I took my eyes half off the display lol –> just long enough to zig when I should’ve zagged ^_^

That’s it, I’m going to bed.

A busy day

I was busy trying to catch up a bit with GTK+, I set out to begin making tests of the various language bindings, starting with C++ and Windows; since I know they all work fine under FreeBSD and GNU/Linux. The first thing I did, was download the GTK Development Environment, which proved to be a disaster.

In allowing the installer to “Register Environment Variables”, the installed nuked my systems %PATH%. So I’ve had to reset it, one bit at time. To ‘shield’ it from any future assaults, I’ve split it up into other system environment variables that get sucked in. That should at least eep me from having to backup the registry… Once if ever, I actually manage to get the XP machine up to snuff again, I’ll need to take a proper backup of the system.

Spent a lot of my time today in training with Jonsi and Caern. First doing training with Jonsi, then dealing with Caern after tending to family business.

I’m omni tasking to the point, that I don’t even get to finish LJ Posts loool

No win situation

Almost to the time where I should be able to code in peace. I’m to damn tired to work alnight, my family is going to make sure I’m not going to be able to code for another several hours, and guess what?

I’m already to damn tired to work at all.

resistance is futile

*SIGH*

It’s no rat fuckin’ use in this place. This morning, I as trying to get ready a few tests to see how GCJ3/4 compared to the compiler J2SE 5.0 in compatilbiity…. Only to facing a living hell from my family. Tonight I tried to sit down and tried to read Programming with gtkmm… Alas, the same problem !!!

Maybe I should just give up learning, programming, computers, [SAS], work, and living life in general: and sit in a corner somewhere, and hope the mother fuckers starve to death before I do… No wait, I’d go first, I get stuck doing to many odds and ends to do otherwise lol. –> I have a strange sense of humour don’t I?

I NEED A FUCKING VACATION !!!

The expression I’m feeling, is not one I’m familiar with in English. When translated from Italian to English, it roughly means “Damn the misery” for most intents and purposes; or as some parts of my family would prefer to say it: “mannaggia la miseria!” I however, have no idea how to appropriately express it in English by any other means lol.

Something that has been on my mind of late

DRAFT POST

I very much need to start standardizing myself on a smaller set of tools. Maybe tools is not the best choice of ord, o much as it is a question of languages and libraries. It’s actually kind of ironic, I really would like to learn several more languages (Ada, Fortran, C#, Erlang, and I never did wrap my head around Scheme).

C++

Pro’s:

can do low level stuff

can interface well with C code and libraries

Qt is natively C++ and supports everything I need it to run on (in Qt4 OSE hehe)

Fairly portable and standardized (at least much of the 1998 standard…) with several compilers available.

Mainly toolkits and frame works available, both native and from C.

Widely used and my first language

Con’s:

having to dig into lower level interfaces is very error prone when doing it with a headache the size of California.

Often not my first choice for building a prototype *quickly* but good for final implementation.

Java

Pro’s:

Inheritable portable between JVMs of the same implementation (e.g. Sun JVM for Win and Sun VM for Mac can run same code).

Simpler OOP syntax then C++, imho

The Swing GUI toolkit is fairly portable and SWT sufficiently supports the platforms I want to avoid skipping.

I like the way it handles exceptions, and usually like checked exceptions — when a class is designed appropriately.

It’s well defined if not perfectly standardized and compliant implementations are fairly common enough (Sun’s)

Wildly used and my third language.

Well documented (if a bit boring)

Con’s:

Everything is OOP….

I prefer native code to waiting on java to load

Requires a suitable runtime

Conventions expected by some tools can occasionally be irksome (to me)

C# (C Sharp)

Pro’s:

It’s not Java

It’s similar to Java/C++

Core elements are standardized

Less resistance to shooting oneself in the foot / doing stupid things then Java but not as much as C++.

Gtk#, the binding of GTK+ to C# is available on the platforms I care about.

Con’s:

Most C# applications are probably tied to Microsoft Windows implementation via .NET or through Gnome related interfaces

Requires a runtime (e.g. .NET, Mono, or Dot GNU)

Requires just enough learning of it’s differences from Java, for me to use it.

PHP5

Pro’s:

Portable and interpreted

Widely used across the WWW for server side scripting.

GTK+ bindings to PHP available and portable’ish

Simple language and member of the CBF.

The OOP increasingly resembles Java syntax and is just “enough” syntax to be useful without cramming.

Well documented

Con’s:

Local php.ini files can cause problems (how much can you assume?)

Needs a run time (php) of the right version (5)

php4/php5 is less common off web servers or developers systems

Python

Pro’s:

Great for writing prototypes

Several toolkits available that are fairly portable

Easy to work with and quit portable (and issues of portability well noted in the docs)

Large standard library

Implementations for the Java Virtual Machine and Microsoft .NET framework are available (if not as current as CPython) as well as the standard (C)Python implementation.

Con’s:

Requires a run time

I *hate* it’s handling of regular expressions after being so used to Perl…

It’s slower then native code

Interfacing with C /or C++ code can, uhh… Get interesting, from a portability perspective.

The program is the source

Ruby

Pro’s:

Handy pure OOP language

Great handling of regular expressions within the language itself, as opposed through importing an object oriented interface (i.e. as in Python/Java/C++)

Usually very “comfortable” to write.

Large standard library

Con’s:

It requires a run time and alternative compilers (e.g. xruby, ironpython) may be lacking in reliability or cause some features to be unavailable

The program is the source

Wishing Ruby 2 would come sooner….

Documentation can be irksome at times

It’s slower then native code and even slower then Python (Ruby 1.8.x)